top_1_963_35.JPG
top_2_1.jpg top_2_2.jpg
 
 
  HOME   PUBLISH   DONATE   ABOUT   CONTACT   HELP   SEARCH  
 
   
Friends of the Court
The Privileging of Interest Group Litigants in Canada
Friends of the Court
Click on image to enlarge

Ian Brodie - Author
SUNY series in American Constitutionalism
Price: $95.00 
Hardcover - 183 pages
Release Date: March 2002
ISBN10: 0-7914-5299-9
ISBN13: 978-0-7914-5299-8

Quantity:  
Price: $31.95 
Paperback - 183 pages
Release Date: May 2002
ISBN10: 0-7914-5300-6
ISBN13: 978-0-7914-5300-1

Quantity:  
Available as a Google eBook
for other eReaders and tablet devices.
Click icon below...


Summary Read First Chapter image missing

Studies interest group litigation in Canada.

In the first book-length study of interest group litigation in Canada, Friends of the Court traces the Canadian Supreme Court's ever-changing relationship with interest groups since the 1970s. After explaining how the Court was pressured to welcome more interest groups in the late 1980s, Brodie introduces a new theory of political status describing how the Court privileges certain groups over others. By uncovering the role of the state in encouraging and facilitating litigation, this book challenges the idea that interest group litigation in Canada is a grassroots phenomenon.

“Brodie's contribution illustrates the importance of the court as a political player in Canada. He demonstrates that the court systematically serves to privilege certain interests over others, in part through its power to grant leave to interveners. By contributing to the literature on the political nature of the court, this book helps inform the on-going debate in Canada, and other countries experiencing the 'rights revolution,' about the dangers of relying on courts to exercise institutional self-restraint.” — Michael Lusztig, author of Risking Free Trade: The Politics of Free Trade in Britain, Canada, Mexico, and the United States

“This is a well-written, astute analysis of an important development in Canadian politics. The application of the 'political disadvantage theory' represents an effective means of making sense of the recent surge of judicial activism in Canada. The author rightly notes the parallel between the American and Canadian judicial activism, and the common wellspring—the strategy of interest group litigation.” — David G. Adler, coeditor of The Constitution and the Conduct of American Foreign Policy

Ian Brodie is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Western Ontario.


Bookmark and Share

Table of Contents

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

INTRODUCTION

1. The Political Disadvantage Theory

2. Interveners at the Supreme Court of Canada

3. Interest Group Litigation and Judicial Supremacy

4. The Market for Section 15 Status

5. Political Disadvantage and State Action

POSTSCRIPT AND CONCLUSION

NOTES

REFERENCES

INDEX



Related Subjects
40435/40436(MR/KW/)

Related Titles

From Marx to Kant
From Marx to Kant
David Dinkins and New York City Politics
David Dinkins and New York City Politics
The Political Party Matrix
The Political Party Matrix
Democracy, Real and Ideal
Democracy, Real and Ideal
The Politics of Persuasion
The Politics of Persuasion
Sharing the Wealth
Sharing the Wealth
The State, Society, and Limited Nuclear War
The State, Society, and Limited Nuclear War
New Directions in Old-Age Policies
New Directions in Old-Age Policies
Morality among Nations
Morality among Nations
The Bitter Taste of Hope
The Bitter Taste of Hope



 
bottom_1_963_35.jpg