Gender and Work

You Have 0 Item(s) In Cart |

My Account |

Order Status |

Check Out |

Gender and Work
A Comparative Analysis of Industrial Societies

Click on image to enlarge

Patricia A. Roos - Author

SUNY series in the Sociology of Work and Organizations

N/A
Hardcover - 233 pages

Release Date: June 1985

ISBN10: 0-88706-031-5
ISBN13: 978-0-88706-031-1

N/A
Paperback - 233 pages

Release Date: June 1985

ISBN10: 0-88706-032-3
ISBN13: 978-0-88706-032-8

Available as a Google eBook for other eReaders and tablet devices. Click icon below...

Summary

A cross-cultural study of gender differentiation in employment, this book holds ontroversial implications for future research in the field. In an analysis of 12 industrial countries, Patricia Roos isolates the effects of gender, family background, education, and marital status, among other variables, on the types of jobs that men and women hold and on their occupational mobility.

The consistency of the results suggests historical, cultural, and political traditions of a country have little impact on the kinds of jobs that women and men have. Rather, patterns of occupational sex segregation reflect structural features common to all modern industrial societies. This book is a milestone in the research on sex and marital differences in employment, occupational distribution, and earnings.

Patricia A. Roos is Assistant Professor of Sociology at the State University of New York at Stony Brook.

Table of Contents

Contents

Preface

1. Differences about Differences

2. Getting the Evidence

3. Men's and Women's Ministry: Different?

4. What Kind of Minister Is Involved?

5. Situational and Background Factors

6. The View from the Pew

7. The Big Picture

References

Appendix

Related Subjects

Sociology of Work

22354/23655(//)

Related Titles


A Diagnosis for Our Times	Notes from Underground	Social Dialectics	Articulated Experiences	Gender and Work
Man's Future Birthright	Formal Theory in Sociology	Expanding the American Dream	Sociology and the New Systems Theory	Questioning Nineteenth-Century Assumptions about Knowledge, II