Moral Responsibility in Twenty-First-Century Warfare

Just War Theory and the Ethical Challenges of Autonomous Weapons Systems

Edited by Steven C. Roach & Amy E. Eckert

Subjects: Political Science, Ethics, Science And Society
Series: SUNY series in Ethics and the Challenges of Contemporary Warfare
Paperback : 9781438480008, 246 pages, July 2021
Hardcover : 9781438480015, 246 pages, September 2020

Alternative formats available from:

Table of contents

Illustrations
Acknowledgments

Introduction: Dual Moral Responsibility and the Ethical Challenges of Twenty-First-Century Warfare
Steven C. Roach and Amy E. Eckert

Part I: Just War and Moral Authority

1. Defending Conventionalist Just War Theory in the Face of Twenty-First-Century Warfare
Peter Sutch

2. The Fantasy of Nonviolence and the End (?) of Just War
Laura Sjoberg

3. Contemporary Nuclear Deterrence Dynamics and the Question of Dual Moral Responsibility
Thomas E. Doyle II

4. Private Military and Security Companies: Justifying Moral Responsibility through Self-Regulation
Sommer Mitchell

Part II: Autonomous Weapons Systems and Moral Responsibility

5. The Rights of (Killer) Robots
David J. Gunkel

6. No Hands or Many Hands? Deproblematizing the Case for Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems
Jai Galliott

7. Ethical Weapons: A Case for AI in Weapons
Jason B. Scholz, Dale A. Lambert, Robert S. Bolia, and Jai Galliott

Conclusion: The Future (Idea) of Just War and Autonomous Weapons Systems
Steven C. Roach

Contributors
Index

Confronts the ethical challenges of warfare carried out by artificial intelligence.

Description

2021 CHOICE Outstanding Academic Title

Moral Responsibility in Twenty-First-Century Warfare explores the complex relationship between just war theory and the ethics of autonomous weapons systems (AWS). One of the challenges facing ethicists of war, particularly just war theorists, is that AWS is an applicative concept that seems, in many ways, to lie beyond the human(ist) scope of the just war theory tradition. The book examines the various ethical gaps between just war theory and the legal and moral status of AWS, addresses the limits of both traditional and revisionist just war theory, and proposes ways of bridging some of these gaps. It adopts a dualistic notion of moral responsibility—or differing, related notions of moral responsibility and legitimate authority—to study the conflicts and contradictions of legitimizing the autonomous weapons that are designed to secure peace and neutralize the effects of violence. Focusing on the changing conditions and dynamics of accountability, responsibility, autonomy, and rights in twenty-first-century warfare, the volume sheds light on the effects of violence and the future ethics of modern warfare.

Steven C. Roach is Professor of International Relations at the University of South Florida. He is the author of Decency and Difference: Humanity and the Global Challenge of Identity Politics and Critical Theory of International Politics: Complementarity, Justice, and Governance. Amy E. Eckert is Professor of Political Science at Metropolitan State University of Denver. Her books include Outsourcing War: The Just War Tradition in the Age of Military Privatization and The Future of Just War: New Critical Essays (coedited with Caron E. Gentry).

Reviews

"…Moral Responsibility in Twenty-First-Century Warfare is a valuable addition to the study of AWS and JWT that answers important ethical questions of modern warfare. " — Perspectives on Politics

"The volume contributes significantly to an ever-expanding discussion of war, just war, violence, and moral responsibility … Highly recommended. " — CHOICE

"This book wrestles with issues that are timely and relevant. " — Todd Burkhardt, author of Just War and Human Rights: Fighting with Right Intention

"Expertly written, this volume offers new ways to think through the ethics of broad theoretical concerns such as the legitimation of moral authority and the challenges to identifying the proper locus of moral responsibility in warfare, as well as provides applied-ethics analyses of different aspects of lethal autonomous weapons systems. " — Eric A. Heinze, University of Oklahoma