top_1_963_35.JPG
top_2_1.jpg top_2_2.jpg
 
 
  HOME   PUBLISH   DONATE   ABOUT   CONTACT   HELP   SEARCH  
 
   
Taking on the Pledge of Allegiance
The News Media and Michael Newdow's Constitutional Challenge
Taking on the Pledge of Allegiance
Click on image to enlarge

Ronald Bishop - Author
Nadine Strossen - Foreword by
Price: $68.50 
Hardcover - 216 pages
Release Date: August 2007
ISBN10: N/A
ISBN13: 978-0-7914-7181-4

Quantity:  
Price: $31.95 
Paperback - 216 pages
Release Date: August 2007
ISBN10: N/A
ISBN13: 978-0-7914-7182-1

Quantity:  
Available as a Google eBook
for other eReaders and tablet devices.
Click icon below...

Available as a Kindle Edition.
Click icon below...


Summary Read First Chapter image missing

Explores atheist Michael Newdow’s constitutional challenge and how the news media marginalized him from the moment the Ninth Circuit handed down its controversial ruling that the Pledge of Allegiance was unconstitutional.

Taking on the Pledge of Allegiance explores the landmark lawsuit filed by avowed atheist Michael Newdow against the Elk Grove Unified School District in California, in which he claimed the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance amounted to an unconstitutional endorsement of religion. Newdow’s original suit was ignored by the public and the news media until June 26, 2002, when the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Pledge of Allegiance was unconstitutional. This decision touched off a firestorm of negative reaction, both from politicians and from the public. The U.S. Supreme Court eventually overturned the ruling on Flag Day 2004.

This book contains interviews with many of the parties involved, including Newdow and journalists who covered the case. Ronald Bishop examines how the news media marginalized Newdow after the Ninth Circuit’s ruling—acting as a “guard dog” for the government and for the ideas supposedly at the ideological heart of America—by framing the decision as an aberration, a radical act by a hopelessly liberal federal circuit court. Bishop concludes that journalists relegated Newdow to a rhetorical “protest zone”—he was heard, but from a safe distance.

“…Bishop persuasively explains … and, in the process, raises important questions about journalism for us all to ponder.” — American Journalism

“As long as people believe that the media represent antiestablishment values, this book needs to be read. As long as reporters mislead themselves into believing they are watchdogs and not lapdogs of the establishment, this book needs to be read. And as long as the media continue to trivialize complex issues and marginalize people who challenge us, this book needs to be read. We need more books like this one.” — Chris Lamb, author of Drawn to Extremes: The Use and Abuse of Editorial Cartoons

Ronald Bishop is Associate Professor in the Department of Culture and Communication at Drexel University.


Bookmark and Share

Table of Contents

Foreword
Introduction

1. Master Myths, Frames, Narratives, and Guard Dogs

2. A Case of First Impression

3. An Impermissible Message of Endorsement

4. A Reputation for Unorthodox Opinions

5. Their Own Little World

6. The Good Mother

7. On to the Supreme Court

8. Tepid and Diluted

9. Nice Try, Young Man

10. We’re Saved—For Now

References
Index


Related Subjects
45906/45907(LC/RM/MC)

Related Titles

Between Femininities
Between Femininities
In Teachers' Hands
In Teachers' Hands
A Creature of Our Own Making
A Creature of Our Own Making
The Theory and Practice of Grading Writing
The Theory and Practice of Grading Writing
Ethnic Studies and Multiculturalism
Ethnic Studies and Multiculturalism
Sex Equity and Sexuality in Education
Sex Equity and Sexuality in Education
Popular Culture, Educational Discourse, and Mathematics
Popular Culture, Educational Discourse, and Mathematics
Good Writing in Cross-Cultural Context
Good Writing in Cross-Cultural Context
The Knowledge Context
The Knowledge Context
Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings
Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings



 
bottom_1_963_35.jpg