top_2_1.jpg top_2_2.jpg
The Final Arbiter
The Consequences of Bush v. Gore for Law and Politics
The Final Arbiter
Click on image to enlarge

Christopher P. Banks - Editor
David B. Cohen - Editor
John C. Green - Editor
SUNY series in American Constitutionalism
Price: $95.00 
Hardcover - 296 pages
Release Date: September 2005
ISBN10: 0-7914-6535-7
ISBN13: 978-0-7914-6535-6

Price: $32.95 
Paperback - 296 pages
Release Date: June 2006
ISBN10: 0-7914-6536-5
ISBN13: 978-0-7914-6536-3

Available as a Google eBook
for other eReaders and tablet devices.
Click icon below...

Available as a Kindle Edition.
Click icon below...

Summary Read First Chapter image missing

Combines perspectives from law and the social sciences to assess the long-term impact of the 2000 presidential election.

The resolution of the 2000 presidential election by the U.S. Supreme Court's Bush v. Gore decision generated an extraordinary outpouring of literature in a very short period of time. Now that the initial furor over the decision has subsided, The Final Arbiter presents a sober consideration of the consequences of the decision for the law, the presidency, and the legitimacy of the American political system. The contributors include well-established names in law and political science, as well as up-and-coming scholars, offering a broad understanding of Bush v. Gore's long-term impact. This book will be useful as a classroom text in both survey courses on elections and the courts and for advanced courses that consider the impact of judicial rulings on the government and political process.

“The book is well written … there is something for most everyone.” — Law & Politics

“…a valuable case study for undergraduates.” — CHOICE

"The breadth of The Final Arbiter sets it apart from other treatments of Bush v. Gore. If one were to teach a seminar on the 2000 election, this would be the one essential text for the Florida events and their aftermath." — Charles E. Walcott, coauthor of Empowering the White House: Governance under Nixon, Ford, and Carter

Contributors include Ann Althouse, Christopher P. Banks, Joyce A. Baugh, Andrew E. Busch, David B. Cohen, Brian J. Gerber, Donald Edward Greco, John C. Green, Charles O. Jones, John Anthony Maltese, Tracy A. Thomas, Daniel P. Tokaji, and John W. Wells.

At the University of Akron, Christopher P. Banks is Associate Professor of Political Science and author of Judicial Politics in the D.C. Circuit Court; David B. Cohen is Assistant Professor of Political Science and coeditor (with John W. Wells) of American National Security and Civil Liberties in an Era of Terrorism; and John C. Green is Distinguished Professor of Political Science and the editor of numerous books, including The Politics of Ideas: Intellectual Challenges Facing the American Political Parties (coedited with John Kenneth White), also published by SUNY Press.

Bookmark and Share

Table of Contents



1. Bushed and Gored: A Brief Review of Initial Literature
John C. Green


2. The Politics of Constitutional Choices in Light of Bush v. Gore (2000)
Christopher P. Banks

3. Bush v. Gore and the Distortion of Common Law Remedies
Tracy A. Thomas

4. Bush v. Gore and Equal Protection: A Unique Case?
Joyce A. Baugh

5. Political Equality after Bush v. Gore: A First Amendment Approach to Voting Rights
Daniel P. Tokaji

6. Bush v. Gore's Place in the Rehnquist Court's Federalism Oeuvre
Ann Althouse


7. Governing after Bush v. Gore: The Challenges of Competitive Partisanship
Charles O. Jones

8. Who Needs a Mandate? The Election 2000 Hullabaloo and the Bush Administration's Governing Agenda
Brian J. Gerber and David B. Cohen

9. Election 2000 and the Future of Electoral Administration: Gauging the Impact of Bush v. Gore on State-Level Electoral Reform
Donald Edward Greco

10. Election 2000 and Its Impact on Campaign Strategy
Andrew E. Busch

11. The Impact of Bush v. Gore and Election 2000 on the Judicial Selection Process
John Anthony Maltese

12. Testing the Limits of Democracy: Pragmatic Legitimacy and the Election of 2000
John W. Wells

13. Reliving Groundhog Day? The 2004 Presidential Election and the Legacy of Bush v. Gore
David B. Cohen and Christopher P. Banks



Related Subjects

Related Titles

Democratizing Global Politics
Democratizing Global Politics
Beyond Boundaries?
Beyond Boundaries?
The Cold War's Last Battlefield
The Cold War's Last Battlefield
Anatomy of Rebellion
Anatomy of Rebellion
Sarajevo Essays
Sarajevo Essays
The Military Intellectual and Battle
The Military Intellectual and Battle
Sovereignty, Democracy, and Global Civil Society
Sovereignty, Democracy, and Global Civil Society
Rethinking the Communicative Turn
Rethinking the Communicative Turn
Getting a Poor Return
Getting a Poor Return
Legal Path Dependence and the Long Arm of the Religious State
Legal Path Dependence and the Long Arm of the Religious State