Heterosexism

An Ethical Challenge

By Patricia Beattie Jung & Ralph F. Smith

Subjects: Family Studies
Paperback : 9780791416969, 248 pages, December 1993
Hardcover : 9780791416952, 248 pages, December 1993

Alternative formats available from:

Table of contents

Preface

Introduction

1. Defing Heterosexism

 

A Reasoned System of Prejudice
Orientation and Behavior
Five Moral Positions Regarding Homosexuality
Conclusion

 

2. Evaluating Heterosexism

 

An Egalitarian Starting Point
Heterosexism: A Noncredible Tradition
A Faithful Reformation
Conclusion

 

3. The Bible and Heterosexism

 

Reevaluating Traditional Interpretations
Traditional Texts "Against Homosexuality"
Traditional Texts "For Heterocentrism"
Conclusion

 

4. The Costs of Heterosexism

 

Discerning True and False Threats
Challenging Christian Preoccupations
Conclusion

 

5. Confronting Heterosexism

 

Foundations for Reforms
The Church as an Inclusive-Exclusive Community
Christian Life and Christian Teaching
A Paradigm Shift in Sexual Ethics
The Focus of Reform
A Symbolic Case Study: Ordination
The Boundaries of Dissent
Conclusion

 

6. Dismantling Heterosexism

 

Toward a Theology of Sexuality
Marriage: A Ritual Test Case
Reassessing Marriage
Conclusion

 

7. Moving Beyond Heterosexism

 

Sexual Authenticity
Sexual Fidelity
Conclusion

 

Postscript

Notes

Bibliography

Index

A ground-breaking book that shows that the prevailing sexual ethic is no longer useful.

Description

In this ground-breaking book the authors show that the prevailing sexual ethic is no longer useful. It presumes as ideal, a uniform morality based on a limited understanding of human sexuality. Heterosexism is revealed to be a system of prejudice that both grows out of and supports this ethic. It produces various forms of discrimination, particularly those against gay and lesbian people, that cannot be justified.

The authors investigate scripture and tradition and explore emerging social scientific data regarding sexual identity, taking seriously the experiences of gay and lesbian Christians. Their investigation supports the view that reformation of Christian sexual ethics is both necessary and possible. They suggest that offering a pluriform rather than a uniform sexual ethic will result in a more responsible and viable dialogue on the ethical questions that emerge when we move beyond heterosexism.

Patricia Beattie Jung is Associate Professor of Theological Ethics at Wartburg Theological Seminary. She is a Roman Catholic laywoman. She has published many scholarly articles and co-edited with Thomas A. Shannon an anthology on Abortion and Catholicism: The American Debate. Ralph F. Smith is Associate Professor of Liturgics and Dean of the Chapel at Wartburg Theological Seminary. He is an ordained Lutheran pastor. His published works include scholarly articles for Worship, Interpretation, and Currents in Theology and Mission, as well as sermons and lectures.

Reviews

"Its basic points are strong and clear: That heterosexism is a sin, and its arguments arise from that clear statement. That, rather than focusing on 'accepting' homosexuality, it considers homosexuality a given and focuses on the problem of heterosexism. It is closely argued and holds up well. " — Anne Barstow, SUNY at Old Westbury

"This book is a critical contribution in both theological-ethical analysis and moral advocacy on an issue that is of enormous importance today. It is currently the most difficult and divisive issue for Christian churches, and literature such as this is desperately needed to bring more clarity, consistency, and adequacy to our dealing with it. " — James B. Nelson, United Theological Seminary of the Twin Cities

"This book is unique in presenting a substantial, well thought-out position that not only critiques the 'heterosexist' bias of 'Western cultures,' but goes on to offer a positive alternative for Christians seeking to assess their traditions. It addresses a culturally pluralistic situation with a powerful hermeneutic that both explores normative issues and allows for a genuine pluralism. " — Robert M. Garvin, State University of New York at Albany