Deconstructive Constitutionalism
Derrida Reading Kant
Alternative formats available from:
Investigates, by way of Derrida's engagements with Kant, how the foundations of modern constitutionalism can be differently conceived to address some of the challenges of the twenty-first century.
Description
Deconstructive Constitutionalism explores the relationship between the thinking of Immanuel Kant and Jacques Derrida concerning modern constitutionalism. Kant is widely recognized as one of the philosophical forebears of modern constitutionalism; that is, the notion that state powers should be defined and limited through a constitution. Kant laid the foundation of constitutionalism through his exposition of freedom, practical reason, and moral law. However, constitutionalism is under severe strain due to the challenges posed by inter alia climate change, global health, global conflict, authoritarianism, authoritarian populism, religious fundamentalism, migration, and inequality. Deconstructive Constitutionalism investigates, by way of Derrida's engagements with Kant, how the foundations of constitutionalism can be conceived differently to address some of these twenty-first-century challenges. The book examines the possible implications of such a re-reading of Kant for democracy, the human-animal relation, criminal law and punishment, as well as for a global constitutional order.
Jacques de Ville is Professor and Dean of Law at the University of Western Cape, South Africa. His many books include Jacques Derrida: Law as Absolute Hospitality and Constitutional Theory: Schmitt after Derrida.
Reviews
"Are our institutions fit for purpose in the era of COVID-19 and climate change? Drawing on Derrida and Heidegger, de Ville interrogates the Kantian assumptions on which our legal and political institutions still rely, addressing key issues of principle from freedom to crime and punishment, the global order, and the human relationship with non-human animals. For legal scholars, the book provides a systematic account of Derrida's critique of conventional legal thinking; for continental philosophy scholars, it represents a major contribution to the study of Derrida's political thought. Over and above that, it suggests new ways in which law and politics must be re-thought in order to meet the challenges of our times." — Nick Mansfield, author of Bastard Politics: Sovereignty and Violence